You are here: Blog --> UC & Messaging

Microsoft Exchange: Physical Vs Virtual Power Utilisation

E-mail Print

There is a great whitepaper on TechNet comparing the power utilisation of native and virtual Exchange environments.  With the recent announcement that virtualisation is fully supported for Microsoft Exchange, I know many customers that are considering it and some that were desperately awaiting it!

The whitepaper is called "Comparing the Power Utilization of Native and Virtual Exchange Environments" and it outlines a test methodology and power utilisation results for physical versus virtual Exchange environments.

WWF releases paper on teleworking, sponsored by Microsoft

E-mail Print

The World Wildlife Fund (not World Wrestling Federation!) have released a new paper on the opportunities presented by teleworking and video conferencing.

In their opening statement, WWF state that they believe virtual meetings and telecommuting have the opportunity to to save more than 3 million tonnes of CO2 – equivalent to about half of the current US CO2 emissions. This paper extends on the WWF’s overall position on the top 10 ICT initiatives they propose would reduce the most carbon.

In their paper WWF propose four different scenarios modelled as “future worlds” which would present varied opportunities for carbon savings:

blog_WWF

The key findings of the paper include:

  • Teleworking has the potential to deliver greater greenhouse gas (GHG) savings than virtual meetings
  • The Smart world scenario would achieve maximum benefits where IT, users and policy makers work together to deliver solutions + policies
  • A laptop with a webcam, wireless internet access & appropriate software represent the key technical requirement for teleworking

 

One of the most interesting insights, and something I see & hear from customers when I talk with them about teleworking, is that it isn’t necessarily the technology that inhibits these types of initiatives – its the organisational change and the cultural barriers.  In the past two years the technology has matured and is lower cost than ever before – but some customers I speak with tell me their organisation just won’t ‘handle the change’.  Typical concerns I hear for teleworking include:

  • Cultural attitude to work: e.g. ‘Mary isn’t working, she is sitting at home watching television / on a beach’.
  • Organisational change:  e.g. training users to utilise the technologies appropriately.
  • Organisational policies: for example, ‘work hours being set between 9-5 - if you aren’t sitting down working during those times then its not acceptable’.  There is obviously a need to be able to contact people during a set of work hours as most workers need to interact with other people and customers, however flexibility & the right internal policies can result in more work being done, not less.  As pictured below, a study from the paper indicates increased productivity from virtual meetings:

blog_WWF2

If you are a visual person, supporting the paper is an interesting scenario & time-based calculator for some European & Asian areas and the US:

blog_WWF3

Overall the paper provides some good research for anyone planning a business case for teleworking and virtual meetings.  Checkout the entire paper HERE and the planning calculator HERE.

***Green IT: New Power & Unified Comms whitepapers***

E-mail Print

There are a few new whitepapers on power savings & telework that have been released recently (some replacing older whitepapers and some brand new):

  • Reducing PC Power Consumption and Costs with Windows Vista - targeted at business and technical decision makers, this whitepaper replaces the old 'Windows Energy Conservation' whitepaper (2007).  Its a nice succinct paper that gives a good overview of what exactly makes Windows Vista more energy efficient, provides data on Energy Star analysis and covers two specific customer examples and the savings they have made with Windows Vista.
  • Addressing the challenges facing the distributed, 21st Century Business Through Telework - this one is a Wainhouse Research report sponsored by Microsoft and was released in June 2008.  Its about 20 pages and covers off the definition of telework, business issues & impacts related to telework, technologies and three different telework scenarios.  Overall it has some good background statistics & info that can contribute to your internal business case for telework / telecommuting / remote working programs.  In the technologies section they are generic but do have a Microsoft Technologies box outlining what can be used from our perspective - its not particularly specific but just wanted to make a note that OCS R2 was recently released (Feb 09) which provides enhanced telephony features if you are considering this technology.  Check out the latest features of OCS R2 or this link for the detailed technical guides.
  • Telework and the US Federal Government: At the Tipping Point - and finally, for those readers of mine in the US, this whitepaper (by the same research group as the one above) takes a specific look at the US government related issues, impacts and case studies.  Although parts of it are obviously very US-government-centric (and repeat elements of the previous whitepaper), it still makes a good reference for other global governments' teleworking strategy development.

Unified Communications: How we saved 160 staff-hours & 4 tonnes of carbon

E-mail Print

Need to start reducing travel and slashing operational costs?  Got a Green IT strategy but need some further business case info? Wanting to build a UC business case?

This month we have published a great case study on how Microsoft Australia ran a trial on changing the delivery model of our monthly manager meeting, which 130 people attend from across Australia.  Instead of having all those people travel to the meeting, Microsoft utilised Roundtable devices in meeting rooms across Australia.  It is quite a good overview on how the meeting was approached, how they setup the room, some recommended best practices on how to handle the human aspects of future meetings and what the dollar and environmental benefits were.  The three graphs below from the paper show the estimated productivity, Co2 & travel dollar savings:

Estimated Productivity Savings

blog_uc1

These savings were based on 160 staff-hours being saved through a reduction in travel.

Estimated Carbon Savings

blog_uc2

Estimated T&E Savings

blog_uc3

The travel and entertainment savings above show an estimated $18k saving in cold hard cash across Australia.

In this calculation, what isn't considered are the soft costs - always a hard one to quantify!  But just to get the ball rolling, one of these soft benefits is the time given back to staff as a result of not having to travel i.e. facilitating a work-life balance: for example: think about how much more time these staff get to spend with their families by not staying overnight in hotels.

Check out the full paper here:  http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd126738.aspx

The sociology of UC

One of the interesting aspects of this mini-study, was the fact that they organised (for the first meeting) to have an IT specialist and a training co-coordinator on hand to ensure the setup was correct and any issues could be resolved ASAP.

One of our UC specialists here in Australia, Sandra, is a big supporter of the sociology aspects of UC.  Whenever we visit customers together there are a couple of recurring themes we discuss with customers.  One of those is when you are planning a UC deployment, realise that realistically not all meetings will or can be changed to video conferences.  If you are starting out with Live Meeting and Roundtable, Sandra suggests selecting:

  • "A Group of people that need to work together (always the best as it is about mapping to not just the way a team meets but the way they do 1:1 discussions and leverage resources whilst in front of a customer or citizen to resolve issues with colleagues in and out of your organisation)  OR
  • A particular team meeting (weekly team or project update meeting) OR
  • An Event (perhaps someone has to fly in for a conference to do a presentation)
  • ...OR a combination of all"

Below are the example business process and metrics Sandra uses when developing PoCs for customers around UC:

 

Business Process

Process Description

Sample Metrics

Access to Experts

End Users need solutions or answers and often the solution requires expertise or contextual knowledge which has to be made available at the point of need. The expertise may often not be available locally but the information needs to be readily available.

  • Improved Productivity
  • Faster Project Completion
  • Shorten Sales cycle time

Remote Meeting And Collaboration

Conducting meetings with team members working out of another location or from home.

  • Reduce Travel
  • Reduce Co2
  • Enhance Staff Engagement
  • Faster Project Completion

Staff Learning and Development

Staff training in outlying areas is expensive and logistically difficult. Sending managers and trainers out to remote branches or getting remote staff together at a central facility for training is challenging and expensive.

  • Reduce Training Costs
  • Improve Staff Engagement

Flexible Workforce - Access to Mail and Enterprise VOIP

Anywhere access to Mail and Communications through better access to key infrastructure remotely.

  • Improve ability to retain employees
  • Reduce Telephony costs

IT Project: Exchange Consolidation with Unified Messaging

An organisations email system today is still fundamental to the way many people communicate. A system that is faster, more reliable and cheaper to run is still core to the Unified Communications strategy.

  • Improve Availability and business Continuity
  • Reduce the cost of compliance

For more detailed UC blogging, also check out: Johann Kruse, Aussie UC Guru: http://blogs.technet.com/jkruse

And if you are interested in User Groups in Oz, check out:

Melbourne UCG: http://melbuc.org

Sydney UCG: http://sydneyuc.org

RSS: News
RSS: Blog
RSS: Podcasts
RSS: Resources
Twitter